<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pa·per cut (pā&#039;pər kŭt)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/</link>
	<description>David Siegel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:16:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Millan</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Millan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>Well..
I&#039;m having many problems with the upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10.
1)No audio on any of the video players.
Only audio is coming from Amarok.
No websites, no nothing...no audio.
2)The web-cam, Logitech, used to be beautiful, clear, crisp, lovely images, with Ubuntu 8.04-9.04...and now, the settings have gone too dark, and I cannot restore them, like I was able to do with not emesene, It just doesn&#039;t work, nor any other web-cam program.
3)Another thing I have noticed, is the new OS uses much more memory and CPU.
I am always on 99-100% CPU usage, even while just scrolling down on the browser; making the entire Kubuntu experience very painful.
Kubuntu 9.04 was always very fast.
I was considering going over to Mac...BUT MAC IS VERY EXPENSIVE.
Haven&#039;t tried Win7....maybe I&#039;ll sin, and do dual-boot with new Win7.
Can anybody help me with all my problems with Kubuntu 9.10?
or tell me how to revert to 9.04, where everything worked just fine?
sonhadorpr [at] gmail [dot] com
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well..<br />
I&#8217;m having many problems with the upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10.<br />
1)No audio on any of the video players.<br />
Only audio is coming from Amarok.<br />
No websites, no nothing&#8230;no audio.<br />
2)The web-cam, Logitech, used to be beautiful, clear, crisp, lovely images, with Ubuntu 8.04-9.04&#8230;and now, the settings have gone too dark, and I cannot restore them, like I was able to do with not emesene, It just doesn&#8217;t work, nor any other web-cam program.<br />
3)Another thing I have noticed, is the new OS uses much more memory and CPU.<br />
I am always on 99-100% CPU usage, even while just scrolling down on the browser; making the entire Kubuntu experience very painful.<br />
Kubuntu 9.04 was always very fast.<br />
I was considering going over to Mac&#8230;BUT MAC IS VERY EXPENSIVE.<br />
Haven&#8217;t tried Win7&#8230;.maybe I&#8217;ll sin, and do dual-boot with new Win7.<br />
Can anybody help me with all my problems with Kubuntu 9.10?<br />
or tell me how to revert to 9.04, where everything worked just fine?<br />
sonhadorpr [at] gmail [dot] com<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I Use and Promote Ubuntu Linux &#8211; Tanner Helland (dot) Com</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I Use and Promote Ubuntu Linux &#8211; Tanner Helland (dot) Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>[...] know I have many concerns about Ubuntu&#8217;s current user experience.  But things like the 100 papercuts project and this commentary from Ivanka Majic, the leader of Canonical&#8217;s design team, give me hope: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know I have many concerns about Ubuntu&#8217;s current user experience.  But things like the 100 papercuts project and this commentary from Ivanka Majic, the leader of Canonical&#8217;s design team, give me hope: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu 10.10 Must Fix as Many Paper Cuts as Possible</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu 10.10 Must Fix as Many Paper Cuts as Possible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m talking about paper cuts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m talking about paper cuts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matteo Settenvini</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Matteo Settenvini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>Purposing a new papercut: in the Gtk+ file-open dialog, if you start typing with your focus on the file list, a text field with what you&#039;re typing appears *over* the &quot;Open&quot; and &quot;Cancel&quot; buttons (or others, depending on the exact dialog configuration).

Thus, if you finished your search and are focusing on the folder/file you want, you need to click one time to make that textfield go away, and then perform your action.

It would be enough to just move that textfield on the bottom-left corner of the file list instead than the bottom-right one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purposing a new papercut: in the Gtk+ file-open dialog, if you start typing with your focus on the file list, a text field with what you&#8217;re typing appears *over* the &#8220;Open&#8221; and &#8220;Cancel&#8221; buttons (or others, depending on the exact dialog configuration).</p>
<p>Thus, if you finished your search and are focusing on the folder/file you want, you need to click one time to make that textfield go away, and then perform your action.</p>
<p>It would be enough to just move that textfield on the bottom-left corner of the file list instead than the bottom-right one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Siegel: One Hundred Paper Cuts Round 6 Progress Report &#124; Full-Linux.com</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>David Siegel: One Hundred Paper Cuts Round 6 Progress Report &#124; Full-Linux.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>[...] milestone. Perhaps this is indicative of the psychology behind paper cuts; the bugs that are easiest to fix often get the least attention. The two paper cuts that made discernible progress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] milestone. Perhaps this is indicative of the psychology behind paper cuts; the bugs that are easiest to fix often get the least attention. The two paper cuts that made discernible progress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdas</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>asdas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>Very good, thanks.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://soska.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rok&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good, thanks.<br />
<a href="http://soska.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/soska.com?referer=');">rok</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ney André de Mello Zunino</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Ney André de Mello Zunino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>I have posted about one old minor pet-peeve of mine, related to getting information on image files on Nautilus. You may read it at http://blog.zunino.eti.br/?p=52.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have posted about one old minor pet-peeve of mine, related to getting information on image files on Nautilus. You may read it at <a href="http://blog.zunino.eti.br/?p=52" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blog.zunino.eti.br/?p=52&amp;referer=');">http://blog.zunino.eti.br/?p=52</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anohito</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>anohito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>Great, i often hear 2 complains from new users in ubunutu that they find non-trivial. maybe not cuts but anyhow..
1. Adding a repository is not as easy as it should be.
2. fileassociation options are not that clear, from firefox and others, how to change, etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, i often hear 2 complains from new users in ubunutu that they find non-trivial. maybe not cuts but anyhow..<br />
1. Adding a repository is not as easy as it should be.<br />
2. fileassociation options are not that clear, from firefox and others, how to change, etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josiah Baker</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Josiah Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a minor pet peeve with the gnome-app-install for a while now, and I think it would qualify as a papercut.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-app-install/+bug/366760</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a minor pet peeve with the gnome-app-install for a while now, and I think it would qualify as a papercut.</p>
<p><a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-app-install/+bug/366760" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-app-install/+bug/366760?referer=');">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-app-install/+bug/366760</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux Info &#124; Canonical prezentē projektu Ubuntu lietojamības īpašību uzlabošanai</title>
		<link>http://davidsiegel.org/paper-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Info &#124; Canonical prezentē projektu Ubuntu lietojamības īpašību uzlabošanai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davebsd.com/?p=252#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>[...] vieglumu un dizainu. Savā blogā viņš aprakstījis projekta One Hundred Paper Cuts funkcijas uz demonstrē daudz konkrētākus piemērus, kādas tieši problēmas klasificējamas kā sīkas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vieglumu un dizainu. Savā blogā viņš aprakstījis projekta One Hundred Paper Cuts funkcijas uz demonstrē daudz konkrētākus piemērus, kādas tieši problēmas klasificējamas kā sīkas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
